Celtic vs Immigrants from Latin America Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Immigrants from Latin America
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Immigrants from Latin America
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Immigrants from Latin America Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 541,789,164 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074 and weighted average of 23.7%, a difference of 4.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Immigrants from Latin America |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 8.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 68.5% |
| Range | 88.9% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 33.1% | 23.7% |
| Median | 27.8% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.5% | 21.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.6% | 26.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Immigrants from Latin America by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Scotch-Irish (22.9%, a difference of 0.92%), Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Central American (23.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.49%), Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.53%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |