Celtic vs Czechoslovakian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Czechoslovakian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Czechoslovakians
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Czechoslovakian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,916,280 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 6.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 7.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 88.9% | 92.6% |
| Mean | 33.1% | 33.3% |
| Median | 27.8% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.5% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.6% | 39.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 18.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 21.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 21.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |