Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Celtic
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
17.0%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
25.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,177,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 17.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.4% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Celtics and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Celtics influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Celtics simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
| Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants from the Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
| Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
| Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
| Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
| Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
| Immigrants from Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants from Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants from Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants from Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
| Immigrants from Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
| Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.018% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 8.2% | 70.9% |
| Range | 8.1% | 67.6% |
| Mean | 1.9% | 25.7% |
| Median | 1.5% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.73% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 34.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 18.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 14.3% |
Correlation Details
| Celtic Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.018% | 128,161,004 | 18.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.071% | 22,011,835 | 14.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 7,867,728 | 14.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 3,244,036 | 15.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 2,060,241 | 15.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 1,251,525 | 11.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 552,505 | 17.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 349,549 | 14.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 159,127 | 15.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 241,528 | 17.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 174,594 | 18.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 102,184 | 18.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 205,475 | 11.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 72,441 | 25.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 106,335 | 17.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 198,065 | 14.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 29,782 | 19.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 20,657 | 21.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 54,555 | 16.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 25,256 | 18.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 5,705 | 34.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 31,114 | 26.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 35,276 | 38.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 8,994 | 18.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 17,196 | 21.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 6,522 | 45.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38% | 3,689 | 25.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 2,395 | 49.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 11,184 | 41.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51% | 14,452 | 20.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 21,149 | 42.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 12,553 | 16.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 21,887 | 17.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 8,889 | 43.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.83% | 7,449 | 23.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.85% | 3,084 | 20.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 2.00% | 501 | 26.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 3,582 | 38.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 5,964 | 12.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 12,524 | 11.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.34% | 128 | 60.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.41% | 14,030 | 41.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.44% | 4,597 | 48.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 5,560 | 37.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 1,294 | 32.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 4,930 | 41.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 3,018 | 13.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 1,700 | 15.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 726 | 66.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 729 | 23.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 2,702 | 70.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.59% | 1,420 | 16.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 424 | 16.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 1,077 | 29.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 2,298 | 6.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 7,087 | 30.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 1,059 | 3.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 681 | 23.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.17% | 1,396 | 24.3% |