Celtic Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Celtic
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Celtic Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
16.4%
POVERTY | CHILDREN < 16
38.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
183rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,036,388 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 16.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.54% in poverty level among children under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Celtics and poverty level among children under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Celtics influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among children under the age of 16 within an area, or if Celtics simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among children under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Hawaiian (16.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Asia (16.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (16.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from South America (16.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and South American Indian (16.4%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Lebanese | 45.9 /100 | #176 | Average 16.3% |
| Ethiopians | 43.4 /100 | #177 | Average 16.3% |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 42.3 /100 | #178 | Average 16.4% |
| Immigrants from Syria | 42.3 /100 | #179 | Average 16.4% |
| South American Indians | 41.8 /100 | #180 | Average 16.4% |
| Immigrants from South America | 40.8 /100 | #181 | Average 16.4% |
| Hawaiians | 38.2 /100 | #182 | Fair 16.4% |
| Celtics | 38.2 /100 | #183 | Fair 16.4% |
| Immigrants from Western Asia | 38.0 /100 | #184 | Fair 16.4% |
| Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.4 /100 | #185 | Fair 16.5% |
| Kenyans | 34.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.5% |
| Arabs | 31.4 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.6% |
| Immigrants from Morocco | 31.2 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.6% |
| Immigrants from Portugal | 30.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.6% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 29.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.6% |
Celtic Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic Data | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.018% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 8.2% | 58.6% |
| Range | 8.1% | 57.2% |
| Mean | 1.9% | 21.5% |
| Median | 1.5% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.76% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 24.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 11.1% |
Correlation Details
| Celtic Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.018% | 128,267,516 | 18.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.071% | 22,265,604 | 14.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 8,049,875 | 14.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 3,317,990 | 15.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 2,113,866 | 15.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 1,295,161 | 11.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 566,342 | 15.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 369,538 | 13.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 163,811 | 14.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 255,502 | 14.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 197,938 | 17.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 110,711 | 18.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 222,467 | 12.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 93,592 | 17.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 106,335 | 17.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 200,793 | 13.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 39,377 | 15.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 23,937 | 20.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 56,817 | 16.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 25,256 | 22.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 5,705 | 23.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 31,832 | 25.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 35,276 | 39.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 8,994 | 20.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 17,196 | 17.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 6,522 | 33.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38% | 3,689 | 15.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 2,395 | 36.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 11,722 | 36.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51% | 16,736 | 17.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 21,149 | 37.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 12,553 | 16.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 21,887 | 21.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 8,889 | 36.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.83% | 7,449 | 24.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.85% | 3,084 | 39.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 2.00% | 501 | 22.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 3,582 | 42.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 5,964 | 14.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 12,524 | 12.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 856 | 4.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.34% | 128 | 10.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.41% | 14,030 | 36.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.44% | 4,597 | 47.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 5,560 | 24.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 817 | 1.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62% | 3,778 | 18.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 4,930 | 26.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 3,018 | 17.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 1,700 | 12.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 726 | 58.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 729 | 43.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.59% | 1,420 | 23.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 424 | 17.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 1,077 | 24.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 2,298 | 4.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 7,087 | 24.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 1,059 | 10.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 681 | 12.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.17% | 1,396 | 21.6% |