Celtic Female Disability

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,857,089 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085 and weighted average of 13.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.17% in percentage of females with a disability.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Celtics and percentage of females with a disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Celtics influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of females with a disability within an area, or if Celtics simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of females with a disability due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Celtics by Female Disability

In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Marshallese (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), French (13.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Yakama (13.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Nepalese (13.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Slovak (13.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Disability
Yaqui	0.0 /100 \| #287	Tragic 13.2%
Whites/Caucasians	0.0 /100 \| #288	Tragic 13.2%
Tlingit-Haida	0.0 /100 \| #289	Tragic 13.2%
Immigrants from Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #290	Tragic 13.2%
Shoshone	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic 13.2%
Yakama	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic 13.2%
Marshallese	0.0 /100 \| #293	Tragic 13.3%
Celtics	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic 13.3%
French	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic 13.3%
Nepalese	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic 13.3%
Slovaks	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic 13.3%
Nonimmigrants	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 13.4%
Immigrants from Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 13.4%
Pennsylvania Germans	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 13.4%
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 13.4%

Celtic Female Disability Correlation Summary

Measurement	Celtic Data	Female Disability Data
Minimum	0.018%	4.6%
Maximum	25.6%	42.6%
Range	25.5%	38.0%
Mean	3.0%	16.5%
Median	2.2%	14.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	1.1%	12.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	3.9%	18.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.8%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.4%	6.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.4%	6.7%

Correlation Details

Celtic Percentile	Sample Size	Female Disability
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.018%	128,364,253	12.4%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.071%	22,462,117	12.7%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12%	8,185,215	12.9%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18%	3,387,918	13.5%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23%	2,195,396	13.3%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28%	1,329,627	12.7%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33%	584,043	13.6%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39%	409,327	13.3%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44%	182,804	13.8%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49%	260,088	13.9%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54%	206,059	14.3%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59%	129,384	14.4%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65%	223,409	13.6%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70%	98,343	14.5%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73%	116,482	12.8%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79%	203,109	14.1%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85%	41,516	16.5%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89%	23,937	15.5%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94%	71,295	15.0%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01%	25,649	14.7%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06%	11,145	21.8%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11%	32,648	12.2%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15%	37,009	20.6%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20%	9,327	18.6%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25%	18,058	19.7%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.31%	8,519	18.9%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38%	4,428	24.3%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42%	3,720	16.5%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44%	12,132	22.9%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51%	21,586	12.7%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57%	24,834	12.0%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61%	12,553	16.8%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71%	24,800	14.4%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77%	9,115	23.7%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82%	10,525	12.7%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.85%	4,046	22.4%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93%	2,119	18.7%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96%	3,766	16.4%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02%	7,741	10.2%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10%	5,964	19.3%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18%	12,524	13.7%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22%	856	12.0%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28%	1,054	14.6%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.34%	128	27.5%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.41%	16,879	18.4%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.44%	4,597	25.2%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47%	364	4.6%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54%	5,560	18.8%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57%	2,486	23.4%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62%	3,854	11.0%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69%	781	23.5%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82%	71	10.5%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86%	4,930	18.7%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92%	3,018	11.8%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.95%	1,220	17.9%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00%	1,700	9.0%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.04%	988	41.6%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16%	729	42.6%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.27%	1,468	16.5%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29%	2,702	21.0%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60%	2,863	15.2%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.85%	52	6.2%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.88%	103	9.8%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.97%	604	10.3%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01%	424	14.9%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18%	1,077	12.1%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22%	2,298	12.2%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35%	138	14.9%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60%	7,087	14.8%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82%	1,059	14.8%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.87%	1,457	7.4%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94%	81	9.8%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.26%	38	8.3%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.37%	428	33.2%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57%	3,179	16.4%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46%	681	17.0%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74%	89	9.7%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.14%	2,679	16.7%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.17%	1,396	22.3%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.44%	308	23.9%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81%	295	25.9%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.52%	21	10.0%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.26%	234	34.1%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.56%	583	13.3%

Celtic Female Disability

COMPARE

Celtic Female Disability Tragic

Celtic Female Disability Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Celtics by Female Disability

Celtic Female Disability Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Celtic Female Disability
Tragic