Celtic vs Australian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Australian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Australians
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Australian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,875,753 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 11.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Australian |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 88.9% | 91.9% |
| Mean | 33.1% | 31.8% |
| Median | 27.8% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.5% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.6% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 22.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 22.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |