Immigrants from Ecuador vs British West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,966,306 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 4.6 British West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 24.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $85,571, a difference of 6.9%), and median household income ($80,341 compared to $75,647, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($44,462 compared to $44,552, a difference of 0.20%), median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $49,636, a difference of 1.7%), and per capita income ($41,195 compared to $40,330, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 18.9%), male poverty (12.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and family poverty (11.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 0.52%), single female poverty (22.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and female unemployment (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.2%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.050%), family households (64.8% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 24.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and college, 1 year or more (53.4% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.99%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.5%).