Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,480,234 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 5.0 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $57,580, a difference of 6.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $96,537, a difference of 5.6%), and median family income ($92,837 compared to $97,222, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $38,833, a difference of 0.49%), median earnings ($44,462 compared to $45,090, a difference of 1.4%), and per capita income ($41,195 compared to $40,434, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.53%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.8%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.33, a difference of 0.28%), and family households (64.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 133.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 74.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 17.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 38.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 57.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 13.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (93.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (93.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and 6th grade (95.3% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.87%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.3%).