Immigrants from Congo vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,864,481 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.276% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 275.5 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $51,783, a difference of 19.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $85,066, a difference of 17.9%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $78,166, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $35,629, a difference of 3.8%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $37,407, a difference of 4.7%), and median earnings ($39,169 compared to $41,719, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 20.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 20.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.81%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (39.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 17.7%), family households (59.2% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.43, a difference of 6.1%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 60.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 37.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 33.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.78%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.59%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%).