Lumbee vs Pima Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Pima
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Lumbee
Pima
23.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Pima Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,256,229 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 23.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,212 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588 and weighted average of 23.6%, a difference of 0.31%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Pima |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 5.7% |
| Maximum | 65.5% | 79.5% |
| Range | 63.6% | 73.8% |
| Mean | 28.4% | 28.6% |
| Median | 28.6% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.3% | 37.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 19.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 15.8% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Pima by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.0%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 6.2%), Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and Yup'ik (21.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.3%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 6.5%), Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and Yup'ik (21.5%, a difference of 9.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |