Lumbee vs Crow Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Crow
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Lumbee
Crow
23.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Crow Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,256,229 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 23.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,198,506 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 22.1%, a difference of 6.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Crow |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 65.5% | 50.2% |
| Range | 63.6% | 44.6% |
| Mean | 28.4% | 26.8% |
| Median | 28.6% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.3% | 39.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 23.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Crow by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Pima (23.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.0%), Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and Yup'ik (21.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yup'ik (21.5%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.2%), Hopi (21.0%, a difference of 5.6%), Sioux (20.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and Yuman (20.8%, a difference of 6.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |