Lumbee vs Yakama Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Yakama
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Lumbee
Yakama
23.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Yakama Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,256,229 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 23.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,707 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 18.0%, a difference of 30.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Yakama |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 7.1% |
| Maximum | 65.5% | 52.1% |
| Range | 63.6% | 44.9% |
| Mean | 28.4% | 20.1% |
| Median | 28.6% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.3% | 22.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Yakama by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Pima (23.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.0%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and Yup'ik (21.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Central American Indian (18.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colville (17.8%, a difference of 1.6%), Black/African American (18.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |