Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age > 16
65.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,602,231 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208 and weighted average of 65.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.35% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Costa Ricans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Costa Ricans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Costa Ricans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Lithuania (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants from Eastern Asia | 94.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 94.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants from Philippines | 94.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants from Guatemala | 94.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Icelanders | 94.3 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants from North Macedonia | 94.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants from Lithuania | 93.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Costa Ricans | 93.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Guatemalans | 92.5 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants from Argentina | 92.4 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 92.4 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants from West Indies | 92.0 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants from Taiwan | 90.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 40.9% |
| Maximum | 26.9% | 89.9% |
| Range | 26.8% | 49.0% |
| Mean | 5.2% | 64.5% |
| Median | 3.8% | 65.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 60.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 69.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 8.5% |
Correlation Details
| Costa Rican Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 193,645,789 | 65.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 35,491,257 | 65.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 11,357,176 | 65.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 4,996,050 | 65.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 2,813,197 | 66.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 1,719,023 | 64.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 890,528 | 65.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 648,588 | 64.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 353,272 | 62.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 324,312 | 65.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 218,565 | 64.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 140,157 | 64.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 147,760 | 64.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 73,547 | 67.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 202,355 | 67.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 90,548 | 59.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 38,329 | 57.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 35,924 | 70.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 11,161 | 74.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 45,765 | 65.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 30,438 | 69.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91% | 70,951 | 68.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 40,321 | 68.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 8,266 | 54.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.35% | 24,178 | 66.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.42% | 12,649 | 69.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 1,273 | 55.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 2,292 | 65.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 21,507 | 63.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.96% | 30,866 | 60.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 8,954 | 69.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 786 | 60.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.41% | 9,781 | 61.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 9,105 | 51.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 587 | 59.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 3,309 | 52.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 16,602 | 76.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.36% | 616 | 61.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.42% | 277 | 58.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.60% | 1,519 | 71.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.85% | 8,287 | 62.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 5,373 | 54.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.39% | 5,226 | 56.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.61% | 9,676 | 76.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 915 | 40.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.41% | 297 | 53.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.55% | 159 | 43.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 14,778 | 72.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.14% | 372 | 89.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 11,906 | 74.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.07% | 1,132 | 75.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.81% | 657 | 65.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 98 | 52.9% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.80% | 4,771 | 61.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.60% | 253 | 70.1% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.76% | 167 | 80.1% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.88% | 584 | 76.3% |