Costa Rican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Costa Rican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
16.2%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
64.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,202,107 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463 and weighted average of 16.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.4% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Costa Ricans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Costa Ricans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Costa Ricans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
| South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
| Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants from Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
| Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants from South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
| Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
| Lebanese | 45.4 /100 | #175 | Average 16.6% |
| Hungarians | 45.1 /100 | #176 | Average 16.6% |
Costa Rican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 14.8% | 80.0% |
| Range | 14.7% | 78.0% |
| Mean | 3.9% | 19.6% |
| Median | 3.1% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 16.8% |
Correlation Details
| Costa Rican Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 192,660,510 | 18.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 34,963,506 | 15.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 11,084,336 | 15.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 4,876,733 | 14.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 2,725,099 | 13.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 1,667,516 | 12.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 866,749 | 18.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 600,905 | 14.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 329,560 | 15.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 265,202 | 16.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 153,394 | 10.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 120,198 | 20.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 137,535 | 12.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 71,223 | 18.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 196,812 | 12.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 82,241 | 13.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 35,645 | 25.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.35% | 3,406 | 10.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 7,644 | 2.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 42,871 | 20.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 30,438 | 17.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91% | 70,544 | 13.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 38,935 | 7.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.13% | 1,085 | 15.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 21,040 | 38.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.41% | 7,629 | 9.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.50% | 628 | 66.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 2,292 | 3.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 21,507 | 17.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.96% | 30,866 | 21.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 8,738 | 5.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 1,568 | 27.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 3,309 | 4.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 16,602 | 13.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.36% | 616 | 8.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.42% | 277 | 5.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.60% | 1,519 | 5.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 5,373 | 15.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.39% | 5,226 | 15.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.61% | 9,676 | 20.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 915 | 65.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.55% | 159 | 50.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.23% | 14,173 | 12.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 11,906 | 14.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.07% | 1,132 | 11.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 98 | 80.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.80% | 4,771 | 56.4% |