Costa Rican vs Canadian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Canadian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Canadians
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
45.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Canadian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,352,495 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 1.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Canadian |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 13.6% |
| Maximum | 69.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 63.1% | 86.4% |
| Mean | 25.8% | 39.9% |
| Median | 22.6% | 32.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.4% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.7% | 53.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 28.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 22.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 21.7% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Canadians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |