Costa Rican vs British Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
British
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
British
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs British Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,545,848 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | British |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 17.3% |
| Maximum | 69.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 63.1% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 25.8% | 44.7% |
| Median | 22.6% | 34.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.4% | 21.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.7% | 70.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 48.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 29.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 29.0% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and British by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |