Costa Rican vs Danish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Danish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Danes
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Danish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,634,769 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 0.090%.
![Costa Rican vs Danish Single Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/single-female-poverty/costa-ricans-vs-danes-single-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Danish |
Minimum | 6.5% | 16.6% |
Maximum | 69.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 63.1% | 83.4% |
Mean | 25.8% | 35.4% |
Median | 22.6% | 28.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.4% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.7% | 40.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 18.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Danes by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.17%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |