Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 20-24
75.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
64.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,576,845 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 75.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.0% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Costa Ricans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Costa Ricans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 within an area, or if Costa Ricans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Bolivian (75.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (75.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (75.2%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (75.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and Cambodian (75.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
| Immigrants from El Salvador | 71.7 /100 | #156 | Good 75.3% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 71.5 /100 | #157 | Good 75.3% |
| Immigrants from Bolivia | 71.0 /100 | #158 | Good 75.3% |
| South American Indians | 69.0 /100 | #159 | Good 75.3% |
| Japanese | 68.7 /100 | #160 | Good 75.3% |
| New Zealanders | 65.4 /100 | #161 | Good 75.2% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 64.6 /100 | #162 | Good 75.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #163 | Good 75.2% |
| Bolivians | 64.0 /100 | #164 | Good 75.2% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #165 | Good 75.2% |
| Cambodians | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 75.2% |
| Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 57.5 /100 | #167 | Average 75.1% |
| Immigrants from Western Africa | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 75.1% |
| Immigrants from Philippines | 55.8 /100 | #169 | Average 75.1% |
| Mexicans | 52.1 /100 | #170 | Average 75.1% |
Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 58.4% |
| Maximum | 26.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 26.8% | 41.6% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 82.1% |
| Median | 3.7% | 78.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 74.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 93.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 11.6% |
Correlation Details
| Costa Rican Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 193,645,789 | 74.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 35,491,257 | 75.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 11,355,528 | 75.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 4,989,636 | 75.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 2,809,620 | 75.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 1,714,039 | 76.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 890,528 | 77.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 647,242 | 74.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 352,399 | 71.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 324,312 | 68.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 218,565 | 75.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 140,157 | 76.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 146,068 | 79.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 73,547 | 67.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 202,355 | 77.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 90,548 | 70.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 36,814 | 82.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 35,924 | 83.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 11,039 | 81.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 45,765 | 73.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 30,438 | 74.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91% | 70,544 | 83.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 40,321 | 77.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 7,397 | 74.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.35% | 24,178 | 81.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 11,821 | 95.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.57% | 645 | 70.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 2,292 | 88.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 21,507 | 58.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.96% | 30,866 | 61.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 8,738 | 82.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 786 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.41% | 9,781 | 72.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 9,105 | 78.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 3,309 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 16,602 | 97.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.36% | 616 | 94.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.42% | 277 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.60% | 1,519 | 93.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.85% | 8,287 | 93.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.15% | 1,594 | 100.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 5,373 | 81.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.39% | 5,226 | 81.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.61% | 9,676 | 88.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 915 | 100.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.55% | 159 | 100.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.23% | 14,173 | 64.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 11,906 | 70.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.07% | 1,132 | 100.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.81% | 657 | 69.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 98 | 100.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.80% | 4,771 | 78.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.60% | 253 | 100.0% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.76% | 167 | 100.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.88% | 584 | 93.2% |