Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 25-29
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
91.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,578,861 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 85.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.51% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Costa Ricans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Costa Ricans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 within an area, or if Costa Ricans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Austria (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Slavs | 93.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Japan | 93.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 93.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Hong Kong | 92.8 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 92.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants from Southern Europe | 92.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants from Austria | 91.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| New Zealanders | 91.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 91.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Senegalese | 90.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Irish | 90.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 90.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.9 /100 | #115 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Chileans | 88.8 /100 | #116 | Excellent 85.0% |
Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican Data | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 71.1% |
| Maximum | 26.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 26.8% | 28.9% |
| Mean | 4.7% | 88.3% |
| Median | 3.6% | 86.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 84.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 95.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 7.8% |
Correlation Details
| Costa Rican Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 193,640,980 | 84.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 35,491,257 | 84.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 11,353,337 | 84.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 4,988,110 | 85.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 2,812,418 | 86.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 1,717,247 | 84.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 890,528 | 85.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 647,242 | 85.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 353,272 | 84.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 324,312 | 82.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 218,565 | 85.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 140,157 | 87.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 147,760 | 89.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 73,547 | 82.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 200,037 | 87.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 90,548 | 82.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 38,098 | 83.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 35,625 | 84.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 11,039 | 75.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 45,765 | 78.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 30,438 | 83.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91% | 70,544 | 84.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 40,321 | 89.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 8,266 | 98.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.35% | 24,178 | 89.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.42% | 12,649 | 90.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 1,273 | 86.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 2,292 | 95.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 21,507 | 95.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.96% | 30,866 | 96.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 8,738 | 83.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 786 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.41% | 9,781 | 71.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 9,105 | 73.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.59% | 501 | 77.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 3,309 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 16,602 | 93.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.36% | 616 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.42% | 277 | 85.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.60% | 1,519 | 95.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.85% | 8,287 | 91.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.15% | 1,594 | 100.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 5,373 | 92.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.39% | 5,226 | 92.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.61% | 9,676 | 95.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 915 | 100.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.41% | 297 | 100.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 14,778 | 92.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 11,906 | 94.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.07% | 1,132 | 75.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.81% | 657 | 71.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.80% | 4,771 | 100.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.60% | 253 | 100.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.88% | 584 | 92.0% |