Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from Indonesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,607,896 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Immigrants from Indonesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to an increase of 62.1 Immigrants from Indonesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($74,031 compared to $60,935, a difference of 21.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($129,122 compared to $107,627, a difference of 20.0%), and per capita income ($57,742 compared to $48,195, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,424 compared to $55,521, a difference of 7.0%), wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($49,256 compared to $43,412, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 34.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (13.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 7.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.7%), births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.88%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (68.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 31.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.1%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.2%), and master's degree (22.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (18.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 5.0%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.7%).