Immigrants from Taiwan vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,470,672 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to an increase of 17.7 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,742 compared to $37,407, a difference of 54.4%), median male earnings ($74,031 compared to $47,990, a difference of 54.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($129,122 compared to $85,066, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,424 compared to $51,783, a difference of 14.8%), wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($77,051 compared to $56,089, a difference of 37.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 88.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 75.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 75.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (13.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 13.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 40.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 57.3%), births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 55.4%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.0% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.43, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 131.3%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 116.5%), and master's degree (22.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 99.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (7.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 53.4%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (18.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 9.9%), cognitive disability (15.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 15.4%).