Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from Poland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,863,586 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.399. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from Poland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to a decrease of 17.6 Immigrants from Poland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($116,460 compared to $90,549, a difference of 28.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($129,122 compared to $101,065, a difference of 27.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($135,508 compared to $106,319, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,424 compared to $55,474, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and median female earnings ($49,256 compared to $41,630, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 45.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.93%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 20.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and divorced or separated (9.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), family households (68.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (50.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 37.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 54.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 91.6%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 65.8%), and master's degree (22.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (7.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.4%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 0.32%), cognitive disability (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.1%).