Immigrants from Nicaragua vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,840,298 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $48,977, a difference of 8.8%), and median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $50,611, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($76,784 compared to $76,387, a difference of 0.52%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,108 compared to $89,811, a difference of 0.79%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,914 compared to $85,899, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 38.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 36.7%), and married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 26.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.1%), family households (67.5% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.69%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (43.7% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.39%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 0.20%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and college, under 1 year (57.6% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 0.79%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 36.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.20%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.5%).