Immigrants from Nicaragua vs British West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,663,579 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.480. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to an increase of 35.5 British West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 27.6%), median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $40,299, a difference of 11.9%), and median earnings ($41,737 compared to $44,552, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,914 compared to $85,565, a difference of 0.77%), median family income ($88,267 compared to $88,987, a difference of 0.82%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,085 compared to $51,463, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 18.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.47%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 42.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 41.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.8%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 199.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 96.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 76.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 28.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 56.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 76.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.6%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.99%, a difference of 16.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.92%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 2.4%).