Immigrants from Asia vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 314,008,336 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,741 compared to $37,407, a difference of 33.0%), median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $47,990, a difference of 31.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $85,066, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $51,783, a difference of 8.9%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $56,089, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 39.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 39.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 5.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.9%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 33.5%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.43, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 24.1%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 75.5%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 68.5%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 27.0%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.7%).