Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,734,421 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($99,933 compared to $92,029, a difference of 8.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $102,616, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $41,373, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($49,741 compared to $49,412, a difference of 0.67%), householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $64,952, a difference of 4.1%), and median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $60,388, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.7%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.080%), poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 13.7%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.34%), currently married (48.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 47.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.2% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 35.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 2.4%).