Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Switzerland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,783,902 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Switzerland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.0 Immigrants from Switzerland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,741 compared to $54,866, a difference of 10.3%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $53,528, a difference of 5.3%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($53,310 compared to $53,211, a difference of 0.19%), median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $43,996, a difference of 0.46%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $115,934, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 17.6%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.49%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 12.0%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households (66.1% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.9%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.8%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.2%).