Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,456,491 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to an increase of 30.5 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $99,516, a difference of 11.3%), median household income ($99,933 compared to $90,005, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $106,217, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.5%), per capita income ($49,741 compared to $46,876, a difference of 6.1%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $41,375, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.9%), single female poverty (18.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and single mother poverty (26.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (49.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 4.5%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.35%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.29%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.0%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and bachelor's degree (44.3% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 9th grade (94.4% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.8%).