Immigrants from Asia vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,953,499 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.367. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 25.1 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $48,093, a difference of 31.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $85,144, a difference of 30.1%), and median family income ($118,291 compared to $91,087, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $52,626, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $56,321, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 44.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 43.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 7.2%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 37.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.41, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 66.6%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 53.6%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.48%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.1%).