Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 498,109,659 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.374. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.039% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 38.9 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,741 compared to $33,931, a difference of 46.6%), median family income ($118,291 compared to $83,639, a difference of 41.4%), and median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $44,960, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $50,422, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $52,801, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 56.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 55.0%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.6%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 4.6%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.52, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 119.5%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 108.2%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 97.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and female disability (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.7%).