Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 284,626,243 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.644. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 7.1 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 43.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $87,035, a difference of 33.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $83,298, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $51,038, a difference of 10.5%), median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $38,625, a difference of 14.4%), and median earnings ($53,310 compared to $43,026, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 70.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 44.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.0%), single mother poverty (26.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 31.4%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 49.1%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 44.8%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.0%), family households (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 53.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 30.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 77.5%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 54.3%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.090%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.0%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.9%).