Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Immigrants from Liberia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,276,223 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia within Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.447. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Liberia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs corresponds to a decrease of 7.3 Immigrants from Liberia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 50.8%), householder income under 25 years ($65,329 compared to $47,981, a difference of 36.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,936 compared to $80,863, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,159 compared to $37,970, a difference of 3.1%), median earnings ($48,304 compared to $42,923, a difference of 12.5%), and per capita income ($45,195 compared to $38,165, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 52.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (13.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 51.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.7%), and single mother poverty (23.8% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 43.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 81.1%), births to unmarried women (22.0% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 71.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.43%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.87%), and family households (68.2% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 75.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 31.8%), master's degree (15.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 26.5%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 26.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.0%).