Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Immigrants from Iran Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,800,667 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran within Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.208. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Iran. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs corresponds to a decrease of 25.1 Immigrants from Iran.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,195 compared to $57,759, a difference of 27.8%), median female earnings ($39,159 compared to $47,154, a difference of 20.4%), and median family income ($109,622 compared to $130,894, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,201 compared to $126,940, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($65,329 compared to $55,880, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (13.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 41.0%), receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and single father poverty (11.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.45%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 46.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 19.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (22.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 9.0%), family households (68.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and married-couple households (51.8% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.080%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 83.2%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 62.0%), and master's degree (15.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.8% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.19%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 23.6%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.4%).