Choctaw vs Comanche Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Comanche
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Choctaw
Comanche
6.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Comanche Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,584,402 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,532,955 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.677 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 5.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Comanche |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 31.2% | 50.0% |
| Range | 28.3% | 46.6% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 8.4% |
| Median | 8.8% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Comanche by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Barbadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Colville (6.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.2%, a difference of 0.99%), Immigrants from Bahamas (6.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (6.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Bangladeshi (6.0%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.0%, a difference of 0.74%), Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.87%), Alaskan Athabascan (6.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and Jamaican (6.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |