Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Chickasaw
22.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,196,728 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431 and weighted average of 22.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 17.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.22% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 64.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 64.4% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 23.7% | 35.8% |
| Median | 20.5% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.1% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.2% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Immigrants from Middle Africa (22.3%, a difference of 0.040%), West Indian (22.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and French (22.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
| French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
| West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |