Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Native/Alaskan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Native/Alaskan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Natives/Alaskans
22.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Native/Alaskan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,196,728 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431 and weighted average of 22.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,027,149 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 26.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 0.22% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 64.6% | 73.3% |
| Range | 64.4% | 65.1% |
| Mean | 23.7% | 37.0% |
| Median | 20.5% | 36.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.1% | 30.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.2% | 42.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 10.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Immigrants from Middle Africa (22.3%, a difference of 0.040%), West Indian (22.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and French (22.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
| French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
| West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.68%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |