Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Celtics
22.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,196,728 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431 and weighted average of 22.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Celtic |
| Minimum | 0.22% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 64.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 64.4% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 23.7% | 33.1% |
| Median | 20.5% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.1% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.2% | 39.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh and Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Immigrants from Middle Africa (22.3%, a difference of 0.040%), West Indian (22.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Liberian (22.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (22.4%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
| West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |