Comanche vs Immigrants from Congo Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
Immigrants from Congo
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Comanche
Immigrants from Congo
25.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Immigrants from Congo Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,354,794 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321 and weighted average of 25.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,983,877 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486 and weighted average of 25.3%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Comanche | Immigrants from Congo |
Minimum | 7.4% | 6.1% |
Maximum | 75.2% | 75.0% |
Range | 67.8% | 68.9% |
Mean | 34.6% | 26.6% |
Median | 29.9% | 24.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.8% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.1% | 28.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.3% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.0% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Immigrants from Congo by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (25.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Somali (25.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |