Swiss vs Pima Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
 Pima
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Swiss
Pima
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
43.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Pima Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,822,088 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,415 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 34.3%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Pima | 
| Minimum | 0.81% | 3.8% | 
| Maximum | 26.5% | 29.5% | 
| Range | 25.7% | 25.7% | 
| Mean | 7.5% | 11.0% | 
| Median | 6.3% | 8.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 12.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 5.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 6.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 6.2% | 
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Swiss by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188  | Fair 6.2%  | 
Demographics Similar to Pima by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Colville (8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 0.83%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 0.92%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 7.8%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 7.9%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 7.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 8.0%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 8.0%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 8.3%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 8.5%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 8.6%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 8.7%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 8.8%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 8.9%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 9.3%  |