Nonimmigrants vs Immigrants from Moldova Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,400,751 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.345. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Moldova. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Immigrants from Moldova.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,669 compared to $47,489, a difference of 16.8%), median household income ($79,429 compared to $91,446, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,301 compared to $101,091, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income over 65 years ($57,426 compared to $62,939, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,448 compared to $107,357, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 36.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 31.7%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 30.2%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.32%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and family households (64.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.9%), master's degree (13.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 24.7%), and bachelor's degree (34.2% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 40.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.2%).