Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Pima
17.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
6.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 350,243,206 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 59.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Pima |
Minimum | 6.5% | 11.0% |
Maximum | 73.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.0% | 89.0% |
Mean | 22.6% | 41.2% |
Median | 17.6% | 34.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.9% | 57.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 36.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa are Immigrants from Thailand (17.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Malaysian (17.8%, a difference of 0.33%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants (17.7%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |