Hispanic or Latino vs Immigrants from China Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Hispanic or Latino
Immigrants from China
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Hispanics or Latinos
Immigrants from China
6.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
75.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hispanic or Latino vs Immigrants from China Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 562,804,515 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,254,097 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 20.6%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hispanic or Latino | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 13.8% | 7.7% |
| Range | 9.5% | 6.0% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 5.1% |
| Median | 6.1% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Hispanics or Latinos by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Hispanics or Latinos are Shoshone (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Spanish American Indian (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Ecuadorian (6.3%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Italy (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Greece (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| South Africans | 70.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 70.0 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 69.6 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
| Albanians | 68.3 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |