Central American vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,924,631 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 50.9%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Central American	Immigrants from China
Minimum	4.9%	1.1%
Maximum	69.0%	24.4%
Range	64.1%	23.3%
Mean	24.6%	12.0%
Median	21.7%	11.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	18.5%	8.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	29.2%	14.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.7%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.7%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.7%	4.7%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Liberia (20.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Zaire (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Belizean (20.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and West Indian (20.3%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 20.1%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 20.1%
Comanche	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 20.2%
Belizeans	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 20.2%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #278	Tragic 20.2%
Immigrants \| Zaire	0.0 /100 \| #279	Tragic 20.2%
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.0 /100 \| #280	Tragic 20.2%
Central Americans	0.0 /100 \| #281	Tragic 20.2%
West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #282	Tragic 20.3%
Senegalese	0.0 /100 \| #283	Tragic 20.3%
Yaqui	0.0 /100 \| #284	Tragic 20.3%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	0.0 /100 \| #285	Tragic 20.3%
Iroquois	0.0 /100 \| #286	Tragic 20.4%
Blackfeet	0.0 /100 \| #287	Tragic 20.5%
Haitians	0.0 /100 \| #288	Tragic 20.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%