Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 286,763,186 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.437. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.633% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to a decrease of 632.7 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $49,741, a difference of 9.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $56,379, a difference of 4.8%), and median household income ($96,743 compared to $99,933, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($53,490 compared to $53,310, a difference of 0.34%), median male earnings ($63,715 compared to $63,240, a difference of 0.75%), and median female earnings ($44,541 compared to $44,198, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 15.2%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.8%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 10.8%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.49%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.2%), no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.4%), professional degree (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.21%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.7%).