Canadian vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 430,722,051 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.006. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($87,769 compared to $99,933, a difference of 13.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $110,787, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $116,566, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $56,379, a difference of 7.7%), and per capita income ($45,858 compared to $49,741, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.2%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.9%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 19.2%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.090%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 44.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.58%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.8%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.94%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.8%).