Immigrants from Europe vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,090,504 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Europe corresponds to an increase of 68.5 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($95,032 compared to $99,933, a difference of 5.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,828 compared to $67,594, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,984 compared to $116,566, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.59%), median female earnings ($43,523 compared to $44,198, a difference of 1.5%), and median male earnings ($62,057 compared to $63,240, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 10.3%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.18%), female poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 8.4%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.38%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (47.6% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.4%), no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.8%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.25%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.5%).