Osage vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,262,221 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.091% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 90.5 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($75,240 compared to $99,933, a difference of 32.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $116,566, a difference of 31.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $110,787, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.38%), householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $67,594, a difference of 21.4%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $44,198, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 44.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 41.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.32%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 39.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 25.3%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 19.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (63.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 25.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 48.8%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 46.6%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.17%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 72.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 52.9%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.3%).