Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,330,473 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.484% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to a decrease of 484.0 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($94,222 compared to $99,933, a difference of 6.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,713 compared to $110,787, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,633 compared to $116,566, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.23%), per capita income ($49,463 compared to $49,741, a difference of 0.56%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $56,379, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and single female poverty (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.4%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.28%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (48.3% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.9% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.4%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.12%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.2%).