Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty
4.4%
POVERTY | MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILIES
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,959,932 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 4.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.30% in poverty level among married-couple families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among married-couple families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among married-couple families within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among married-couple families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Netherlands (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), French (4.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants from Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants from Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants from Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants from Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants from Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants from Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | Married-Couple Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.078% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 16.9% | 21.7% |
| Range | 16.8% | 20.4% |
| Mean | 5.9% | 6.9% |
| Median | 5.0% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 4.8% |
Correlation Details
| Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 328,097,217 | 4.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 27,365,870 | 3.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 6,105,394 | 3.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 1,843,884 | 3.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 611,028 | 4.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 411,675 | 4.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 166,444 | 4.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 112,664 | 4.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 33,442 | 4.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 25,238 | 6.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 41,102 | 5.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 27,947 | 4.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 13,469 | 5.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.41% | 24,343 | 4.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 16,951 | 3.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 7,704 | 4.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 12,373 | 4.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.40% | 5,776 | 10.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 2,595 | 7.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 4,336 | 7.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 6,565 | 4.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 3,785 | 8.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 3,121 | 6.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 1,000 | 13.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.13% | 310 | 10.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.44% | 2,826 | 7.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 5,653 | 1.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 211 | 20.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 109 | 4.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 340 | 3.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.49% | 1,449 | 17.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 810 | 5.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.10% | 1,000 | 21.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 688 | 10.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.39% | 395 | 6.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 376 | 4.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.50% | 526 | 1.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.56% | 666 | 7.8% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.25% | 59 | 15.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.92% | 591 | 1.3% |