Czechoslovakian Family Households
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
Family Households
Czechoslovakian Family Households
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
82.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,525,502 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.147 and weighted average of 64.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.14% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are South American Indian (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Welsh (64.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (64.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (64.7%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants from China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants from Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants from North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants from Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
| South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
| Immigrants from Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
| Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
| Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
| Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
Czechoslovakian Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | Family Households Data |
| Minimum | 0.078% | 27.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 99.9% | 72.6% |
| Mean | 13.0% | 67.9% |
| Median | 8.5% | 66.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 61.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 74.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 14.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 14.3% |
Correlation Details
| Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 329,670,503 | 63.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 28,349,202 | 65.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 6,521,858 | 66.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 2,024,661 | 65.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 727,622 | 66.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 489,599 | 65.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 251,576 | 70.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 133,841 | 66.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 51,485 | 68.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 39,264 | 63.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 54,545 | 66.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 34,585 | 66.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 23,303 | 67.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.41% | 29,044 | 68.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 23,021 | 70.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 12,327 | 66.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 14,705 | 63.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 11,332 | 69.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 3,714 | 59.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 4,644 | 71.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 6,916 | 68.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 4,061 | 60.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.63% | 3,768 | 74.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 1,984 | 60.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.14% | 586 | 62.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.43% | 3,872 | 60.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 6,197 | 71.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 1,722 | 51.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 211 | 89.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.33% | 191 | 74.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 52 | 73.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 4,174 | 78.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.20% | 561 | 70.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 2,075 | 75.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.52% | 223 | 74.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76% | 605 | 89.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.09% | 22 | 66.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.35% | 278 | 60.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 154 | 32.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.78% | 1,544 | 85.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.08% | 1,418 | 85.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.50% | 1,810 | 78.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.55% | 417 | 87.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92% | 952 | 85.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 1,531 | 49.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.86% | 2,175 | 78.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 376 | 66.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.50% | 526 | 65.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.66% | 161 | 66.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.29% | 588 | 62.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.59% | 1,775 | 65.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.25% | 59 | 60.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.56% | 151 | 52.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.92% | 591 | 79.0% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.09% | 515 | 46.9% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.45% | 489 | 81.8% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.28% | 116 | 53.5% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.00% | 8 | 100.0% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.05% | 122 | 54.2% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 504 | 27.4% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.89% | 87 | 84.0% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.77% | 468 | 31.7% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.42% | 219 | 59.1% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.46% | 141 | 70.3% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.47% | 38 | 71.4% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.70% | 119 | 40.0% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.00% | 18 | 100.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 101 | 100.0% |